| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. EMFI Preliminary Statement on the EIB/EIBI Audit - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Domain Diva on 26/07/2006 11:58:42 Originally by: Ricdic I don't believe you to be an alt of Currin at all. However you do seem misinformed. You have stated that you are willing to place more trust in Currin's comments, aft...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.26 11:52:00
|
2. EMFI Preliminary Statement on the EIB/EIBI Audit - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: HippoKing Originally by: Miss 26 During my time in the corp, Cally chose to share login details for two of his accounts with several directors. One of these accounts contained the charecter placed by Cally in UEMA fo...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.25 11:14:00
|
3. EMFI Preliminary Statement on the EIB/EIBI Audit - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Domain Diva on 25/07/2006 10:58:50 Originally by: Salazar N'terre do you always believe one side of the story, and then quote it as truth? OMG dark Shikari told me about his login details, it must be true Do you always t...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.25 10:55:00
|
4. EMFI Preliminary Statement on the EIB/EIBI Audit - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Salazar N'terre hmm I do not see where cally admitted to sharing his information with anyone? One of Cally's "employee's" has admitted it in this thread if you read through it.... Originally by: Miss 26 First I...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.25 01:11:00
|
5. EMFI Preliminary Statement on the EIB/EIBI Audit - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Domain Diva on 25/07/2006 01:05:59 Originally by: Dark Shikari If they banned everyone who shared accounts, nearly every single major corporation would fall apart instantly. We all know lots of people do it, and the onl...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.25 00:59:00
|
6. EMFI Preliminary Statement on the EIB/EIBI Audit - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Domain Diva on 25/07/2006 00:36:32 Originally by: Dark Shikari Edited by: Dark Shikari on 25/07/2006 00:09:05 I would suggest that people stop making a huge deal about the "EULA violation" in the case that the "thief" gi...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.25 00:36:00
|
7. Reinforced mode... - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Thanks! So if a POS is under attack, can someone just keep shipping in stontium until the attackers get bored? Also, do you get kill rights on the attackers if the POS is in high-sec space? or will concord show up and destroy your ship if you at...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.21 21:35:00
|
8. Reinforced mode... - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Does a POS go into reinforced mode when its shields get down to a certain level? And once in reinforced mode will all the POS modules remain online until the strontium is exhausted? (I assume the POS and all its modules are vulnerable once this ha...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.21 16:53:00
|
9. We need to become organized and take out these dam macros - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It should be CCP's job to police macroers - not the playerbases. If CCP wanted legitimate players to do their work for them they would have at least removed a macroers ability to hide in the sanctuary of NPC corps, or stopped threatening to ban t...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.18 17:10:00
|
10. Why All Characters Should Die Off - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bhaal Originally by: Rodj Blake Old characters do die off. I'm pretty sure that a large chunk of the characters created on day one are no longer being used. I would say the majority... There was like 5000 subsc...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.11 15:15:00
|
11. macro miners does ccp even care? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sensor Error Originally by: Domain Diva Originally by: CrayC They do care... Prove it. Prove they don't. And saying "they're still there" doesn't count. Are you a member of staff at CCP? do you see ...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.10 21:36:00
|
12. macro miners does ccp even care? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malthros Zenobia Originally by: Domain Diva Originally by: CrayC They do care... Prove it. Prove they don't. Apparantly 1000 active accounts where banned last month. So apparantly they do care.
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.10 20:19:00
|
13. macro miners does ccp even care? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tachy Search for Oveur's post in one of the threads about one of the DevBlogs. Somewhere on the third or fourth page into the thread he posted that they recently banned about 1000 accounts. Yes, Oveur made a post saying ...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.10 18:22:00
|
14. macro miners does ccp even care? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CrayC They do care... Prove it.
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.07.10 18:07:00
|
15. test - in EVE Forum Experiments [original thread]
merry christmas
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.06.30 01:22:00
|
16. Escrow bots - What is CCP's opinion? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Even if they could detect who's using them, its highly doubtful they'll do anything about escrow bots considering they do sod all about people using mining bots these days Bots for all, or enforce your eula ccp
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.06.26 18:49:00
|
17. A serious post regarding the plague of ISK farming - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tristan Acoma The bottom line is this - either it needs to be illegal and enforced or it needs to be legal and available to all. Simple as that. QFT.
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.06.16 22:07:00
|
18. A serious post regarding the plague of ISK farming - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP are fully aware of the macro 'problem'. CCP no longer investigate petitoned macroers because the sheer number of macroers infesting eve these days represents a SIGNIFICANT monthly income from macroer subscription fees. When was the last tim...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.06.16 21:55:00
|
19. Great "job" with the manufacturing system CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Vanlade If it happened as you describe then this is a very rare and particular scenario that is very unlikely to happen. Blaming the QA departement for every rare bug that makes it to Tranquility is not very constructive, us...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.06.10 09:04:00
|
20. Missing Escrow - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Domain Diva on 07/06/2006 14:04:49 Originally by: Vistilantus and some people sit with a modified client that auto scans escrow every few seconds, buying anything under a certain threshold so the chances of finding and fixi...
- by Domain Diva - at 2006.06.07 14:04:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |